What to do about Notre Dame.
I waffle between regarding Notre Dame as a shining beacon of college athletics and shrugging my shoulders at the school that symbolizes what I can’t stand in sports.*
Playing Notre Dame Pro and Con is like playing a game of War. You remember War, the card game? You divide the deck in half then turn up the first card, high card takes both. It’s entertaining enough for a little kid. As soon as you get older and know anything about math you realize the entire thing is just an exercise in randomization – an event whose outcome is predetermined. Like ‘will the UPN fall lineup will tank?’, there are just some things in the universe we know for certain. Death, taxes, eating too much, being creeped out by Andy Dick, wishing MTV hadn’t gone straight to hell for the last decade…
In their favor, Notre Dame seems to be one of the few schools that maintains academic standards for their student-athletes. While I’m sure that all colleges try to match that high level, both at acceptance and for graduation, Notre Dame student-athletes had the highest graduation rates, 92%, for enrollees in 1996. They came in second the year before. Notre Dame has actual standards for their student-athletes. Shocker! The school actually expects its student-athletes to attend class and graduate. Right now Bob Huggins is rolling over in his grave and the guy’s not even dead yet.
Notre Dame also schedules a difficult set of games every season, always facing USC and Michigan and often Florida State as well. You have to respect a program that doesn’t take the easy way out (good morning Kansas State) and plays a tough opponent every single game. I may be in the minority but I’d like to see a national championship game between two teams who finished 9-3 facing the toughest schedule strength in the land rather than a pair of unbeaten teams who didn’t face a single challenge mightier than the Northwestern Louisiana Dental College Ragin’ Bicuspids.
On the negative side, Notre Dame’s boosters seem to have some very lofty and very unreasonable expectations for their teams, coaches and the bowl games as well.
Notre Dame’s supporters seem to be under the impression that college football was invented by and for them. They’ve deluded themselves into thinking they are royalty or monarchy. But, like the actual monarchy, their time has passed. Forty years ago there weren’t very many successful football programs on the landscape; now there are dozens. While ND alums may feel let down by consecutive winning seasons, their expectations no longer fit the reality of sport. Nearly every other school in the country would gladly relish the success the Irish football program has enjoyed, but not the golden domers. Most schools are happy to send their team to a bowl game; Notre Dame’s alums don’t seem happy unless the team reaches a BCS bowl, an achievement that will grow more difficult year after year. The Irish haven’t won a bowl game in a decade and the bitter taste being left in their mouths isn’t from an Irish lager – it’s from the AP rankings.
These same alums hinted (and when I say hinted I mean suggested) in a letter to their school of pride and joy last season that if the football team didn’t recapture the glory days of yore, or at least have a winning season, that a coaching change would be required. That’s their prerogative; however, a rational mind would point out that no coach alive can return the Irish to the glory days – those days no longer exist, not for their program, truly not for any program.
No coach on the planet, past or present, can return the Irish to the days of winning the Cotton, Sugar and Orange Bowls in consecutive seasons. Talent is diluted across colleges, players leave early, scrutiny is greater and the pressure is higher. No school, not even the vaunted Notre Dame, can expect to maintain that level of success. Many come close, but there will be no more dynasties.
The best Notre Dame can hope to accomplish is to run a successful program with a winning and respectable coach, which is what every football program should be vying for nowadays. The Irish had both; too bad some boosters think they had neither.
* [Ed. Note: My experiences watching Notre Dame have been primarily in football, therefore the comments are based upon that as well. I am not intentionally ignoring their other sports; I’m simply not familiar enough with them to speak intelligently]